Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and case law at both the federal and state levels.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Compact fees use.
Because the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be arrived at, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only performed If your employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were very well aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
For that reason, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner needs to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these kinds of an appeal has not yet been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may well then seek out further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement on the laws, the legal system adheres on the doctrine of stare decisis
Legislation professors traditionally have played a much smaller role in acquiring case legislation in common law than professors in civil legislation. Because court decisions in civil regulation traditions are historically brief[4] and not formally amenable to establishing precedent, much with the exposition with the legislation in civil law traditions is completed by lecturers instead than by judges; this is called doctrine and should be published in treatises or in journals like Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common regulation courts relied tiny on legal scholarship; thus, within the turn in the twentieth century, it absolutely was quite rare to view an academic writer quoted in a very legal decision (besides Maybe for that academic writings of notable judges which include Coke and Blackstone).
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it is practical for a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to help make an attempt to dispose of a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's attained to a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's got reached this sort of stage. Read more
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a properly-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives from the police will be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, assure legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative with the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Hence, the competent authority on the parent department from the petitioner along with the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount from the petitioner and pay out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits on the petitioner to which He's entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the respondent can also be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits from the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information being gathered via the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
seventeen . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have heard the learned counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of your subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are usually not binding, but could possibly be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance to your party’s argument, or to guide here the present court.